-
Posts
453 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Downloads
Forums
Store
Support
DOWNLOADS EXTRA
Services
Everything posted by Neighigh
-
- 43 comments
-
- #parachute
- #iqparachute
-
(and 8 more)
Tagged with:
-
This tends to happen randomly, had it happen with all types of lootables now. - I've reverted back to 2.0.6 for now so players have full functionality. Otherwise, loving that 2.0.7 stopped the excessive console spam and it definitely is lowering lag on the server!
-
Getting this in console and preventing from further looting: 05/12 22:29:11 | NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object This locks the last looted object's icon on screen and prevents the looting of other objects until the plugin is reloaded.
-
- 43 comments
-
- #parachute
- #iqparachute
-
(and 8 more)
Tagged with:
-
Curious about this, any chance you plan on making an option for use anywhere so long as the player is off ground? I'm having an issue with it failing to recognize me jumping from a heli as is, figure if it wasn't looking for that we'd be good to get past that object not set to instance flag I'm getting.
- 43 comments
-
- #parachute
- #iqparachute
-
(and 8 more)
Tagged with:
-
Sorry I forgot about this! I was also unable to reproduce it after the incident. The original issue was actually produced when the player had used multiple tcs in an overlapping privilege build so I'm beginning to suspect this was the actual cause. For now, the only time a base seems to not take damage with our setup is when it started without a TC. Players just place their own to initiate the raid and all goes well. Any time a TC is broken, the raid continues as it should, which is perfect!
-
Sorry my bad I didn't mention; I'm using custom inventories I want for their looks and drops with Raidable Bases Profiles. NPCKits is overwriting the kits and causing the conflict because it's trying to overwrite all general Scientists on the map and not looking for the ones plugins are spawning.
-
- 54 comments
-
- 1
-
-
- #wipe
- #countdown
- (and 5 more)
-
Any chance we can have the plugin omit NPCKits from affecting the NPC loadouts? Steenamaroo had me check in with you to see if we can get this supported. Currently we've got a little conflict back and forth depending on which spawns first. Here's the convo I had with Steen on the subject: https://codefling.com/files/sc/1718-api-non-null/?tab=comments#comment-8302
-
Copy! I'll relay it over to Nivex's territory and see what we come up with. In the end it comes down to who's plugin loads 2nd. If RaidableBases comes in 2nd, everything works great except we get some double loot spawning action on deaths. whereas if NPCKits comes 2nd, we overwrite the spawned loot intended. - Either way it's a conflict, but it's cool to see different results XD
-
Hi! Great plugin, everything's working well on my end, just one little conflict with another plugin I'm utilizing for it's NPC Loadouts. I'm Using Raidable Bases by Nivex: Looking to make sure the defined loadouts for these NPCs aren't being overwritten by NPCKits. I see the tag about the API needing to "return non null" - Not sure what this means as I haven't played with API stuff at all with any of our plugins. Can you help me out with this? Assuming it's the ticket to resolving the conflict I'm seeing.
-
Perfect! Thanks so much! I've been having a lot of fun editing the tables and bringing in the DLC items or some oddballs like duct tape and maps for giggles. I'll be able to edit the full list with a lot more confidence knowing the method behind it now, appreciate the speedy reply! ALSO: Unrelated, but is there a chance we could see functionality for your other plugin - FacePunch - To be able to damage open the lootables? It's become a staple in our server and would love to keep it's functionality mainstreamed with this too.
-
Trying to understand the methodology to the spawn chances here: "SpawnChanceTimes": 4, "SpawnChanceScale": 5 Is this like 'rolling' on the loot table? Right now my assumption is SpanChanceTimes = how many times the system can include it in total "rolls" for a possible spawn. Second assumption is SpawnChanceScale = the 'weighting' of a possible spawn in a loot table compared to other possible items listed. Would this mean lower numbers = less chance of the item spawning? - For now I cannot tell whether this is the case and it is making it difficult to modify my own loot tables accurately.
-
Found a small issue with tool cupboards. I imagine this may be a bit tricky, but we found once a cupboard was destroyed, we could no longer damage the base or the entities attached. Once we were able to place our own, we could destroy as normal again. So for now, we have an ingame workaround, and thanks to the ingame message it seems to be something any player could figure out how to resolve on their own. I've looked at the cs file in an attempt to find what's calling on this function but I've been unlucky finding the proper edits. I'm feeling it has something to do with a privilage function like priv == null but I'm pretty lost at this point on making a no tc base damageable. Thoughts?
-
Thanks! This worked too, except I couldn't delete the whole string without causing an error with the plugin loading: Error while compiling: AbandonedBases.cs(2157,82): error CS0103: The name `center' does not exist in the current context So now my file reads this instead: var center = GetCenterFromMultiplePoints(foundations); if (EventTerritory(center)) { } All seems to work fine like this
-
That worked perfectly!! We now have a fully PVE server that allows people to defend and attack bases within an acceptable range, while also keeping specified structures indestructible. You've been a major part of this as we use quite a few of your resources, so thank you very much! You've got our continued support for the foreseeable future
-
We've also found a way to handle RP structures that we don't want to be raided at all. Simply not including a TC and assigning a Zone via Dynamic PVP/Zone Manager with appropriate flags to keep them safe has resulted in a great way to maintain them while excluding them from Abandoned Bases.
-
Testing now, so far so good! Only trouble I'm having so far is some of the structures people create on their property are 'too close' to eachother. Is there a parameter we can have available in the config to have control of this feature? I looked at the cs and it's not entirely clear to me how the plugin is going about deciding this so I'm stuck for now. - Will update more while I test this out. So far it's been non-destructive to test this on a live server with the above settings, so looks solid for what we went over so far!
-
Gotcha, that makes sense now, i missed the true/false bit on that setting. I don't have anything to test this with either but I can activate it close to the end of our monthly wipe and give it a go. Would the base owners also lose the ability to loot the boxes or will it keep it's functionality for authorized individuals?
-
That's pretty close to what we want! Hoping to allow the owners to keep running their bases though. I've seen this is a topic covered elsewhere and you're working on it? If so I'm a mega fan of that!!
-
Looks like the lootable prompts appear for objects on cargoship, then as it's moving they stay in place as the cargo and players move away from that fixed point. We may need something that tells these to stay with the cargoship. I imagine this isn't very simple of an idea to implement but I figured it's a bug we should mention in case you are not aware