BetterDeadThanZed
-
Posts
1,104 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Downloads
Forums
Store
Support
DOWNLOADS EXTRA
Services
Everything posted by BetterDeadThanZed
-
Receiving this error when trying to spawn the police car or police transport 04/06 21:28:03 | Failed to call hook 'policetransport' on plugin 'PoliceVehicles v1.3.1' (NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object) at Oxide.Plugins.PoliceVehicles.SpawnPoliceTransport (BasePlayer player) [0x000a6] in <61e429ca0b144d0b806d3ffaa15aa19b>:0 at Oxide.Plugins.PoliceVehicles.policetransport (BasePlayer player) [0x00081] in <61e429ca0b144d0b806d3ffaa15aa19b>:0 at Oxide.Plugins.PoliceVehicles.DirectCallHook (System.String name, System.Object& ret, System.Object[] args) [0x004fa] in <61e429ca0b144d0b806d3ffaa15aa19b>:0 at Oxide.Plugins.CSharpPlugin.InvokeMethod (Oxide.Core.Plugins.HookMethod method, System.Object[] args) [0x00079] in <60c318df79ed41688ea59335e48d61ad>:0 at Oxide.Core.Plugins.CSPlugin.OnCallHook (System.String name, System.Object[] args) [0x000d8] in <50629aa0e75d4126b345d8d9d64da28d>:0 at Oxide.Core.Plugins.Plugin.CallHook (System.String hook, System.Object[] args) [0x00060] in <50629aa0e75d4126b345d8d9d64da28d>:0
-
Players can still access the quarries
BetterDeadThanZed replied to BetterDeadThanZed's Support Request in Support
I tested this again tonight with the update and it works, mostly. I tried to add a player to the authorized list and I received no response from the command in-game. Then I looked in the console and found that this plugin is conflicting with PreventLooting. Giving my team access worked fine, though. This is the error: 04/06 19:03:31 | Failed to call hook 'QuarryShareCommand' on plugin 'QuarryManager v2.0.3' (NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object) at Oxide.Plugins.QuarryManager.AddOrRemoveUser (BasePlayer player, System.Boolean isAdding, System.Boolean isRemoving, System.String[] args) [0x00011] in <313ac249abe14a0bad85c62023d5416b>:0 at Oxide.Plugins.QuarryManager.QuarryShareCommand (BasePlayer bPlayer, System.String command, System.String[] args) [0x004da] in <313ac249abe14a0bad85c62023d5416b>:0 at Oxide.Plugins.QuarryManager.DirectCallHook (System.String name, System.Object& ret, System.Object[] args) [0x0034e] in <313ac249abe14a0bad85c62023d5416b>:0 at Oxide.Plugins.CSharpPlugin.InvokeMethod (Oxide.Core.Plugins.HookMethod method, System.Object[] args) [0x00079] in <60c318df79ed41688ea59335e48d61ad>:0 at Oxide.Core.Plugins.CSPlugin.OnCallHook (System.String name, System.Object[] args) [0x000d8] in <50629aa0e75d4126b345d8d9d64da28d>:0 at Oxide.Core.Plugins.Plugin.CallHook (System.String hook, System.Object[] args) [0x00060] in <50629aa0e75d4126b345d8d9d64da28d>:0 04/06 19:03:44 | Calling hook CanLootEntity resulted in a conflict between the following plugins: PreventLooting - False (Boolean), QuarryManager (True (Boolean)) -
Look good! -
I went into the building and opened the food crate. After I removed everything from it, the fireplace crumbled, like it was the food crate.... the fireplace is gone.
-
This has a .map extension instead of .prefab.
-
Players can still access the quarries
BetterDeadThanZed replied to BetterDeadThanZed's Support Request in Support
I don't think you understand. It still doesn't work. I had a quarry that I gave no permissions to and the player was able to access the fuel and the output and that error that I posted came up when he accessed them. -
Players can still access the quarries
BetterDeadThanZed replied to BetterDeadThanZed's Support Request in Support
I did another test this morning. I can't get the /qm a command to work. When I type /qm a playername it has no reaction at all. If I type /qm a and nothing, it tells me I have to specify the player name. Also, this is in my console. I think it appeared when the other player accessed (successfully) the quarry: Failed to call hook 'QuarryShareCommand' on plugin 'QuarryManager v2.0.2' (NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object) at Oxide.Plugins.QuarryManager.AddOrRemoveUser (BasePlayer player, System.Boolean isAdding, System.Boolean isRemoving, System.String[] args) [0x00011] in <1649046b9e3b4cb6a44d0fd993e3c5f4>:0 at Oxide.Plugins.QuarryManager.QuarryShareCommand (BasePlayer bPlayer, System.String command, System.String[] args) [0x004da] in <1649046b9e3b4cb6a44d0fd993e3c5f4>:0 at Oxide.Plugins.QuarryManager.DirectCallHook (System.String name, System.Object& ret, System.Object[] args) [0x0034e] in <1649046b9e3b4cb6a44d0fd993e3c5f4>:0 at Oxide.Plugins.CSharpPlugin.InvokeMethod (Oxide.Core.Plugins.HookMethod method, System.Object[] args) [0x00079] in <60c318df79ed41688ea59335e48d61ad>:0 at Oxide.Core.Plugins.CSPlugin.OnCallHook (System.String name, System.Object[] args) [0x000d8] in <50629aa0e75d4126b345d8d9d64da28d>:0 at Oxide.Core.Plugins.Plugin.CallHook (System.String hook, System.Object[] args) [0x00060] in <50629aa0e75d4126b345d8d9d64da28d>:0 -
Players can still access the quarries
BetterDeadThanZed replied to BetterDeadThanZed's Support Request in Support
I will test it again. I didn't think that the plugin would be turned off by default. I wouldn't even think there was a setting to do that. -
Players can still access the quarries
BetterDeadThanZed replied to BetterDeadThanZed's Support Request in Support
I just tested this update and the player was able to access the fuel. Now that I type this, I realize should have tested the part where the resources are deposited, but I guess I figured if they can access the fuel, then it's not working as intended anyway. -
I just installed this on my server and I had someone test it out and they can access two quarries that I placed even though they are not shared.. I don't know if it matters, but I use the Prevent Looting plugin along with TruePVE on my server. This is my config: { "General Settings": { "Wipe Data on new save": true }, "Commands": { "Quarry Manager Command": "qm" }, "Chat Settings": { "Chat prefix": "QuarryLocker >>", "Chat prefix colour": "#FF6A13", "Chat icon": 0, "Quarry Share Messages": { "Print a message if team share is enabled": true, "Print a message if team share is disabled": true, "Print a message if a player is added to the share list": true, "Print a message if a player is removed to the share list": true, "Print a message if a player has activated a static quarry": true }, "RCON/Server Console Messages": { "Message the console if someone enables team share": false, "Message the console if someone disables team share": false, "Message the console if someone is added to the share list": false, "Message the console if a player is removed to the share list": false, "Message the console on static quarry lock activated": false } }, "Share Settings": { "Players can toggle other players quarries": false, "Lock quarry containers": false, "Team Sharing": { "Allow team to toggle the quarry": true, "Allow team to open the quarries containers": true }, "Individual Player Sharing": { "Allow added players to toggle the quarry": true, "Allow added players to open the quarries containers": true }, "Static Quarry Sharing": { "Enable static quarry lock": false, "Static Quarry Sharing": { "If the player leaves the dome unlock the static quarry": false } } } }
-
I've never heard of "Oxide's sandbox". What is that and does doing that have the potential to affect other plugins?- 48 comments
-
- 1
-
-
- #performance
- #admintool
- (and 3 more)
-
I was told by Nivex that he will fix this but he's busy fixing other plugins, although from what you guys are saying, this has been fixed. He just hasn't released it.
-
I use Furnace Splitter (https://umod.org/plugins/furnace-splitter). I had a player tell me this: "It seems the furnaces are bugged, if you have them upgraded and have multiple stacks of wood in them, after the first stack is burned it no longer burns the other stacks at the increased rates." When he used a small amount, like 2 stacks of 100, it worked fine. When he tried stacks of 100,000 wood (I use a stacks plugin too), it stopped using the upgraded rate after the first stack of 100,000. When he disabled Furnace Splitter, this didn't happen. So, is this an issue that can be fixed on this plugin or do I need to go to the dev of Furnace Splitter?
-
I just came here to ask about this myself... someone pointed out no points for killing brad.
-
What is the command for the snowmobile? It's not on the description page. -
I just confirmed that the /sar command only works if you are authed. -
If I try to authenticate myself on someone's locked TC, it says I'm not authorized. Probably because of the TruePVE plugin.
-
In the ticket I opened in Discord (which apparently was closed), I mentioned how non-abandoned bases were getting caught in the radius of the abandoned bases. That makes them raidable when they shouldn't be. Will this be addressed soon? It seems like a major bug. Shouldn't this plugin just make all entities owned by the player raidable, instead of creating a bubble where everything is raidable?
- 572 comments
-
- 1
-
-
- #rust
- #rust plugin
- (and 6 more)
-
I thought that only let you turn your own base into a raidable base.
- 572 comments
-
- 1
-
-
- #rust
- #rust plugin
- (and 6 more)
-
I have a feature request: A command for admins that let them turn any base they are looking at into an abandoned base.
- 572 comments
-
- 1
-
-
- #rust
- #rust plugin
- (and 6 more)
-
Custom base K, when you go inside and look down into the entrance, you don't see the water until you jump in.
-
I am trying to use this on a custom map (Frontier by Gruber) and there's no reaction when I type the /getmonumentpos command. The plugin loads properly with the o.reload command and there's no error in the console.
-
Regarding these settings: "Do Not Destroy Player Built Deployables": false, "Do Not Destroy Player Built Structures": false, Does this only destroy player structures within the raid dome?
-
I just wanted to give my moderators permissions for those two commands. I don't want them to have access to all of the other commands that comes with raidablebases.allow. -
I guess there's something lost in the translation. I was wondering if there was a permission to only give access to those two commands. I guess from your curt reply that there is none.
