nivex
-
Posts
5,628 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
194
Content Type
Profiles
Warranty Claims
Downloads
Forums
Store
Support
DOWNLOADS EXTRA
Services
Everything posted by nivex
-
Changed Status from Pending to Closed
-
no problem
-
good
-
it's a hit or miss and there's nothing I can do about it until Rust fixes the issue
-
nice. just use the rbe debug command and it will tell you
-
Changed Status from Pending to Closed
-
you need to set purchase prices in the config
-
Changed Status from Pending to Closed
-
heya. it is 0 to 100 so set it to 50 that overrides convert options when set above 0
-
haha yeah
-
it lasts 1 wipe if the plugin isn't loaded during the wipe then it can't remove the titles when the server wipes /rb wipe will force it -
it's added in the update too np
-
ok think I found the issue. add this on line 2794 and it should fix it if (priv.IsKilled() || building == null || building.decayEntities.IsNullOrEmpty()) { _skipped++; yield break; } it will look like this when you're done
-
it is realistic. lockers are specially coded to self equip with kits. kits is what you would typically find in a locker. I can make it divide but I don't see the point. if lockers are to hold kits then those kits shouldn't be in boxes. that's the logic anyway. spreading the loot out into multiple boxes is ideal but takes away from that realism I can add it I'd you want
-
hi no. only specific items can go into the locker and lockers do not work with divide loot option.
-
hi it will always spawn in a random box
-
ok will check it out when I get home
-
np. I'll see about Raid Protection support in a future update then. I want to get this update out asap first- 617 comments
-
- 1
-
-
- #rust
- #rust plugin
- (and 6 more)
-
@Tomato_Jesus the plugin won't break with the Rust update. the plugin update will be soon though
- 617 comments
-
- 2
-
-
- #rust
- #rust plugin
- (and 6 more)
-
it's planned but there's no way to currently do this. there are far too many issues to resolve before it can be implemented because the event can overlap other bases if players build too closely. those overlapped bases won't be raidable, but it is difficult to determine who should be ejected. in the next update there is a new option to prevent players from looting anything in the abandoned bases, and I will likely add a second Eject Enemies option to remove players when they step on a foundation unless I can find an elegant solution to eject them when they enter the dome instead. either way, it will serve the same purpose and be just as effective.
-
I don't know why this happens I will try to fix it in the next update
-
OnEntityTakeDamage is a non-bool hook so returning true would still cancel the method which would block the damage but will fix the conflict issue CanEntityTakeDamage would allow you to unsubscribe OnEntityTakeDamage to reduce hook times between the plugins and is a bool hook
