Mr01sam
-
Posts
1,443 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
26
Content Type
Profiles
Warranty Claims
Downloads
Forums
Store
Support
DOWNLOADS EXTRA
Services
Everything posted by Mr01sam
-
It does collect the scrap up front, as in, it takes it out of the player's inventory and adds it to the protection balance. But players can always withdraw that protection balance by pressing "clear" (unless you disable that button in the config), so it hasn't spent that balance yet, just holds onto it. When the base is actively being protected it will then deduct the amount from the protection balance every few seconds until its depleted. But it will only do that when its actively protected. If you have offline only protection, the balance will not be deducted until all owners go offline, so they can withdraw that balance when theyre online if they choose to do so. Let me know if that makes sense!- 276 comments
-
- 1
-
-
- #protection
- #base
- (and 5 more)
-
Changed Status from Pending to Not a Bug
-
Yeah its best just to delete the data folder
-
If you have offline only protection (as in while online you have 0% protection) then players should NOT be actively charged scrap until they go offline. If they are, that is a bug.
-
Unfortunately you can't do it at a different price for online vs offline currently.
-
1800ms is 1.8 seconds... so not perfect but certainly not as bad as 18!
-
Cost per damage protected is a setting you can use that will charge protection balance for every point of damage protected. So if you have cost per damage protected set to 1, and your building has 100% protection, and a rocket does 100 damage to your building, then it will subtract 100 from the protection balance in order to protect the building. If the protection balance is depleted from this it will then be unprotected. So yes, if you have cost per damage protected set to 0 then raiders will not be able to deplete a protection balance from attacking it. Assuming that the protection for the building is set to 100% and the player has some protection balance, it should be protected as long as they have balance.
-
Yes, a rewrite is in the works, but for now if you're having issues with the latest version I recommend v1.0.10 -
Hey, my apologies, I did not add the feature of triangle costs yet. The update last night was to fix some console spam that was reported. I'm thinking through the triangle cost thing now, if you would like I could send you a version to test out when I have it ready. Is that something you would be interested in?
- 276 comments
-
- 1
-
-
- #protection
- #base
- (and 5 more)
-
Changed Status from Pending to Closed Changed Fixed In to 3.3.2
-
Changed Status from Work in Progress to Closed Changed Fixed In to 3.3.2
-
if I were to do this, do you think there would be an issue if the costs affected triangle floors too?
-
Changed Status from Pending to Work in Progress
-
https://discord.gg/zAnCFbmnR2 Hopefully that one will work for you - I followed Mals advice this time!
-
I used to have a pricing sheet for all the building blocks, but it was at the cost of some performance. I could include different pricing for triangle floors, but I would probably just hard code it to be 50% cost, would that work for you?
-
Hey Mal, thanks for the tip. I was pinging about them not having access to the discussions board though, is that something you can assist with?
-
I'll DM you
-
Changed Status from Pending to Not a Bug
-
Changed Status from Pending to Closed
-
Closing this for now - we believe this to be a conflict with NPC Spawn. Waiting for confirmation before a fix is implemented.
-
Changed Status from Pending to Not a Bug
-
My apologies with the discord link heres another one: https://discord.gg/qC5WCGPA As for the discussion thing maybe @Mals can help you with that?
-
Changed Status from Pending to Closed Changed Fixed In to 1.2.1
-
Changed Status from Pending to Closed Changed Fixed In to 1.2.1
-
Changed Status from Pending to Closed Changed Fixed In to 1.2.1
