Steenamaroo
-
Posts
3,678 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
208
Content Type
Profiles
Warranty Claims
Downloads
Forums
Store
Services
Downloads Plus Support
DOWNLOADS EXTRA
Everything posted by Steenamaroo
-
Are they all custom profiles? Custom profiles automatically disable themselves when wipe is detected, on the assumption that their locations wont make sense on the new map. If that was the case but you recycle maps and don't want this to happen, you can set Disable_Non_Parented_Custom_Profiles_After_Wipe to false. -
Nah, Enable Targeting Hook isn't related. That's a BotReSpawn call to let other plugins decide to let / not let BotReSpawn attack their npcs. CanBradleyApcTarget BotReSpawn - True (Boolean) Your BotReSpawn settings are saying that APC can target BotReSpawn npcs. That means you have APC_Safe false somewhere. You probably want it set to true.
-
Thanks for doing that and letting me know. For the vanilla loot profiles (Rust_Loot_Source) BotReSpawn does check if you have AlphaLoot and, if so, it does make a call to AlphaLoot to get its version of the loot for that particular source. `DefaultNPC` would be scientistnpc_roam so I guess maybe Alphaloot is set up to give them nothing? You could either make changes in Alphaloot to make sure that npc type gets loot, or change the `Rust_Loot_Source` to something else in BotReSpawn UI.
-
Hi @Lei_Wong I'd need to look into this. I never actually tested drone defence first hand - I had someone else testing and reporting back.
-
@Kaj Van der Hallen - Hi again. I just checked and they're getting vanilla Rust loot just fine over here. I had a profile on Default NPC and it gave me some pistol bullets and stuff, then I changed to Beehive and it gave me honey so all looks good. Maybe you've got some other loot plugin wiping the loot for these npcs? If you're struggling to track it down it might be worth unloading any plugins that manage loot (whether they're meant to affect npcs or not), then testing again.
-
@Kaj Van der Hallen - Thanks for letting me know. I'll check very shortly and see what's going on. @MelodyZE - Hi, I'm not seeing an issue here. Have you used `bot.count` command in console to 100% confirm? It gives you the total number of spawned npcs. `bots.count`, with the 's', gives you a per-profile breakdown. Also type nav_wait into console and see what the result is. It should be true. If it's false it means navmesh gets created after the server boots up, which means there's no navmesh for npcs at startup and you'd need to reload the plugin X minutes later. @TwoShoes - You've got APC_Safe set to false for some profile that's near a Bradley. Doesn't necessarily have to be a Bradley even or Launch site profile. It could be airdrop or a biome or...any profile that's close enough to an APC.
-
Don't worry about doing any more testing. I looked into this with a few other users and got to the bottom of it a few days ago. That'll also be addressed in the next update. If it's an issue, until then, you can run 1.3.9 without issues. Thanks for the info!
-
I understand. I have it sorted now. There'll be a an update on or before Thursday, for Jungle biome, so the fix will be in there. Thanks again for reporting. That was just pure oversight.
-
Hi, I'll take a look at that right now. Thanks for reporting it.
-
Is that a custom monument or a copy/paste?
-
Ok, I'm looking into it. Thank you. In the mean time you should be able to use 1.3.9 without issue.
-
Are you able to give an example of where this is happening at a vanilla monument, so I can recreate the issue?
-
Hi, Can you show me some examples? Are these at vanilla monuments or custom?
-
I was actually thinking about implementing scroll and lifting that limit recently. I can't promise you a time scale but I'll take a look at this fairly soon. -
Two questions per day...
-
Yes, there's API documented on the front page here.
-
Hi, I expect that's probably a setting at the npcspawn end or, if not, maybe some PVP/PVE/Damage control plugin you have. From BotReSpawn end if they're firing at the other npcs I've done my bit,
-
@sykosmurf- Thanks for the suggestion. I'll take a look in to that. @Trade Accept - That sounds like it could get messy fast. If I added a true/false in the config for multiply activity, so you can have activity rewards be fixed (ignoring multipliers) would that help? -
Nevermind - I just updated publicly.
-
"I'm playing on a server running this plugin and it's driving players off the server." Sorry, I just re-read this. Have the server owner/customer contact me or post here, if you would.
-
Hi, Thanks for reporting it. I'm aware of this and it'll be addressed in the next update. A short term 'solution' is to disable Ai_Weapons_Safe for the affected profiles Alternatively I can DM you the pre-release copy if you're willing to test.
-
Can you be more specific with plugins names and the exact nature of the problem? If there's something 'better' I can do to address it, I will. BotReSpawn doesn't really do anything until OnServerInitialized which, during server boot, is a long long time after all plugins are loaded, so load order shouldn't really matter? If you want to DM or get me on discord instead, go for it.
-
Yeah, I can't see why not. I'll take a look some time soon and get in touch.
-
I agree with rejecting AI submissions. Codefling has always placed importance on our creators truly owning, and fully understanding, their work. This stance initially emerged due to how easy it is to take snippets of other people's work without permission but it should apply just the same, in my opinion, to 'AI' generated work. Understanding exactly how a work was created and how it works is essential when it comes to maintaining that work and troubleshooting potential issues with it. We've had exceptions in the past where we allowed submission of 'bought and paid for' works on the condition that any required maintenance would be handled by the original developer, essentially allowing 'the creator' to be a support middle-man. I think I'm correct in saying it doesn't work and we don't allow it anymore. Where paid assets are concerned it's a competitive environment. There are many ways to maintain an edge and be successful, such as how you handle support requests, how well tested your code is, how quickly you respond to wipe issues, your personality, etc, but whether you wrote and/or understand the code should not be in that list. That should be mandatory. If someone wants to use AI as a learning or development tool I'm all for it. Whatever works for you... but if any reviewer has any doubt at all that a submitting creator could recreate any given work 100% from scratch with no assistance, that work should be declined.
-
It may be a problem but it's not my problem. At least not as far as I know. That usually indicates some issue with PVE settings.
