Death

Thanks for the overwhelming amount of feedback on this. We will use this to better improve our processes to better serve our users and creators! While we'll be locking this to additional replies, you can still vote on the poll if you haven't done so yet. The poll will close April 15th.

Here's the list of prefabs that were removed in the world 2.0 update: Assets/Content/Nature/Rocks/v3/Cliff_low_arc_arid.prefab Assets/Content/Nature/Rocks/v3/Cliff_low_arc_overhang.prefab Assets/Content/Nature/Rocks/v3/Cliff_low_arc.prefab Assets/Content/Nature/Rocks/v3/Cliff_low_sloped_L_arid.prefab Assets/Content/Nature/Rocks/v3/Cliff_low_sloped_L.prefab Assets/Content/Nature/Rocks/v3/Cliff_low_sloped_R_arid.prefab Assets/Content/Nature/Rocks/v3/Cliff_low_sloped_R.prefab Assets/Content/Nature/Rocks/v3/Cliff_medium_arc_arid.prefab Assets/Content/Nature/Rocks/v3/Cliff_medium_arc.prefab Assets/Content/Nature/Rocks/v3/Cliff_medium_sloped_L_arid.prefab Assets/Content/Nature/Rocks/v3/Cliff_medium_sloped_L.prefab Assets/Content/Nature/Rocks/v3/Cliff_medium_sloped_R_arid.prefab Assets/Content/Nature/Rocks/v3/Cliff_medium_sloped_R.prefab Assets/Content/Nature/Rocks/v3/Cliff_tall_arc_arid.prefab Assets/Content/Nature/Rocks/v3/Cliff_tall_arc.prefab Assets/Content/Nature/Rocks/v3/Cliff_tall_pinch_a_arid.prefab Assets/Content/Nature/Rocks/v3/Cliff_tall_pinch_a.prefab Assets/Content/Nature/Rocks/v3/Cliff_tall_pinch_b_arid.prefab Assets/Content/Nature/Rocks/v3/Cliff_tall_pinch_b.prefab

Is this their actual name, or do you have a plugin changing their displayName?

Of course, you just need to replace all of the removed prefabs.

Be sure to have a look at https://codefling.com/services/ also and filter by plugin development. Plenty of fantastic developers looking for work!

This was a recent change, so give it some time. I feel it's better on the left. I just added a divider to hopefully prevent misclicks. Also to make text bold you can use the hotkey CTRL + B and bypass having to click it altogether. Honestly I don't even know how useful that is now of days with the new live editor. I've removed it for now to see if there's anyone who actually uses it.

I'll have a look. Thanks for letting us know.

We've enabled post moderation to try and reel things back in. It's absolutely fine to have your own opinion, so please avoid personal attacks.

The warranty only covers refunds in the event the file becomes unmaintained or discontinued. Simply not needing it anymore is not a valid reason and falls under buyers remorse. If there are any issues with these files please do reach out. https://codefling.com/help

Using AI-generated code without the basic understanding of the language is extremely dangerous. I'm sure any developer here can tell you some of the cooked shit they've seen it generate. Will keep this discussion running for another week, so if you'd like to chime in don't miss out.

Identifying AI generated code is not as trivial as you think it is. It's quite easy and I'll bet even the most intermediate programmer can easily identify it. It's very predictable.

Ah yes, let us just publish a cheat sheet to feed chatgpt to bypass detection. What a perfectly logical approach. Again, if you think it was a bad call the invitation to join us in a voice call to prove us wrong is still on the table, but I have a sneaky suspicion this won't happen.

I think most understood this, and it's a bit too late now. I have made it so you can change your vote now.

More than happy to jump in a voice call with you to prove our process is quite effective.

AI code is pretty easy to identify if you know what you're looking for, and no, we do not use AI for code detection. In cases we're unsure we invite you to join a conference so we can make sure you understand the code by asking basic questions about it over voice so you can't just AI the awnsers.

I think they mean in the context of selling plugins made by AI. But generally speaking, I would not be using plugins made entirely by AI. It even warns you not to, and I don't think it'll ever get to the point where it would be advisable. The code is usually quite dangerous imo

This is a forum. You do not need to use AI to speak with other people. Speak your native language and we can translate.. But as of right now it's like I'm talking to an AI chatbot.

Your dependence on AI truly shows. There's absolutely no advantage to using AI here, yet you chose to do so. You're taking the humanity out of this exchange for absolutely no reason. I'm also going to venture to guess most of your files are primarily written by AI?

The fact you're using AI to make your responses is some kind of beautiful irony.

This is completely incorrect. First off, it would be more work and take more time to depend on Copilot unless you're stuck on a specific problem. Also, autocompletion has nothing to do with copilot. This is called IntelliSense which we've had since the 90s. Even the very old model of ChatGPT can make completely functional plugins from a couple word prompt with very little effort, albeit very terrible plugins, but it seems the people who rely on AI don't really care for quality anyways. The downplay on AI here is a bit sus