Death
-
Posts
1,319 -
Joined
Content Type
Profiles
Downloads
Forums
Store
Support
DOWNLOADS EXTRA
Services
Everything posted by Death
-
That's completely unnecessary. If it weren't supported, it wouldn't be listed there. If it is, it should be removed. It would completely defeat the point of that.
-
Not a terrible idea, but I argue that communicating with said creator would be just as effective and doesn't require an additional workflow for creators and development overhead for us to achieve a similar outcome.
-
Due to the lack of response, we've disabled the file to prevent future sales. If you do not have a response by the 23rd, please follow up here, and we'll proceed with a refund since you're still under warranty.
-
It's both easy and generic. Quite literally, anyone can ask AI to make you a plugin. But by all means, you're more than welcome to seek out a marketplace that will sell you AI-generated plugins
-
Please submit a support request here: https://codefling.com/plugins/pookevent?tab=support
-
It's a great concept, but in reality, it'll become a huge moderation issue. We'd need to make sure these files actually work with the other, and even then, authors can easily add support for it simply to be included in the other file's dependency list. I don't think creators would be thrilled about the idea personally.
-
We appreciate the feedback. Seems the vast majority agrees with the direction we're going, and we hope to define the quality threshold for AI thumbnails very soon.
-
This seems like a contradiction, though, since you said you disagreed with rejecting AI submissions, implying that most of it was made using AI. Using AI to help is not an issue, as reflected in our guidelines. Before AI, I was dual-wielding Google tabs like a crack head.
-
As a server owner myself, knowing the only way you were able to solve an issue is with AI, and it still took you 2-3 hours, is a bit concerning. At that point, I would question who's actually doing the work, and why would I pay you to do it if I could just make the prompts myself?
-
There's been a tremendous trend in AI-generated content in this space, so we felt it was essential to get ahead of it before it spirals out of control. We've seen quite a bit of feedback on our official stance against content made primarily using AI, so before we go full send, we want to make sure we're making the right call. Our current stance on AI content is as follows: Submissions generated entirely by AI are not allowed. However, AI-assisted content is welcome if it enhances your creative process and that any AI usage is clearly disclosed in your product description. We've been more lenient towards product thumbnails and free content where we felt the author was making a reasonable effort to learn. With that being said, I personally feel like it's getting out of control, especially for thumbnails. While we likely won't prohibit the use of AI-generated images, we want to set a clear quality threshold so the site doesn't become a wash of generic looking content. Personally, I feel the biggest concern at the moment is AI-generated plugins, especially those that are paid. I dislike the idea of someone trying to profit from content they did not make, nor are they capable of maintaining outside of their reliance on AI. Full disclosure: I find AI to be extremely helpful, and I use it quite often, but I use it as a tool to improve my process, not completely replace it. Let us know your thoughts about this. Are we being too harsh, or are we making the right call? This may seem pretty obvious from the perspective of a developer, but that's because we understand the code and know how cooked a lot of these AI-generated plugins are. It would be great to have a consumer perspective.
- 109 replies
-
- 19
-
-
-
Is this still an issue on the latest version of Carbon @steampunkvalley?
-
@SrMiller
-
@Answer
-
@Cobalt Studios
-
It seems the author was responsive to comments, so I recommend giving them a bit more time to respond to your support request. I'll ping them here so they're aware of your outstanding support request. @Keirox
-
Reminder to use the support tab for issues. Thank you! -
One time. Anything with a renewal will state renewal length and time to the right of the price. -
Are these images located in the Skins (No need to upload to the server!) folder by chance?
-
Yeah sorry, I have no clue either. Was just trying to help. Hopefully the author can clear things up but personally it seems like a feature that's not implemented yet, but planned.
-
This is why we typically recommend having values pre-filled as it's impossible to know without knowing the structure of the class. I'll help in this case though. Static NPCs in this case, is a Hashset of NpcPresetLocationConfig: public string presetName { get; set; } public string navMeshPresetName { get; set; } public string position { get; set; } Knowing it's a list of that class, we can build an example entry: "Static NPCs": [ { "presetName". "navMeshPresetName". "position" }, { "presetName2". "navMeshPresetName2". "position2" } ], The structure for Regular Npcs is the exact same, it's a Hashset of NpcPresetLocationConfig. I have no clue what any of these values do, but if you do, you should know how to fill it in. I imagine this was done intentionally as it's not implemented yet. But wanted to share this in case you experience this in the future, so you know generally how to populate an empty list inside of a config or data file.
-
Seems to be an issue with your save.json not being writable by the server. If this is linux make sure the user has access to read and write that file. Also please use the Support Tab for issues.
-
@cameron
-
@dustyhansen @dutchess Is this still an issue?
-
@averageatbest was this resolved?
