cooing
-
Posts
10 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Downloads
Forums
Store
Support
DOWNLOADS EXTRA
Services
Everything posted by cooing
-
I’d like to respond to your reply. In today's development environment, it's practically unheard of for developers to build everything completely by hand without any assistance from tools — including AI. Utilizing AI does not invalidate the originality or quality of a submission. In fact, leveraging available tools is an industry standard and part of working efficiently and professionally. While I did use AI as a support tool for parts of my code, the overall architecture, logic, integration, and refinement were all done by me. The plugin reflects my intent, decisions, and manual effort — not a copy-paste output. I'm genuinely unsure what criteria you're using to conclude that it was "entirely AI-generated," but if this is based on personal interpretation rather than objective analysis, I believe that's a serious concern. Dismissing a submission simply due to suspected AI involvement, regardless of its actual merit, raises important questions about fairness and modern development practices.
-
Thank you for reply but This isn't just an excuse — it's a clear failure of responsibility. Regardless of the internal process, taking nearly a month to review a plugin is utterly unacceptable in this day and age. It signals negligence in maintaining the platform and a lack of regard for developer support.
-
OMG…. It’s hard to believe the plugin review process could take up to a month… it’s honestly quite discouraging. Is there any way to get it reviewed more quickly?
-
Other plugins were approved within a few hours, but I submitted mine on Tuesday and it’s still not approved. When can I expect it to be approved?
-
Why does this happen occasionally? (14:43:59) | Failed to execute OnFrame callback (An item with the same key has already been added. Key: 1) at bool System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<ulong, System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<string, object>>.TryInsert(ulong key, Dictionary<string, object> value, InsertionBehavior behavior) at void System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<ulong, System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<string, object>>.Add(ulong key, Dictionary<string, object> value) at void Oxide.Plugins.CopyPaste.PasteEntity(Dictionary<string, object> data, PasteData pasteData, BaseEntity parent) in /home/rustserver/serverfiles/carbon/plugins/CopyPaste.cs:line 2377 at void Oxide.Plugins.CopyPaste.PasteLoop(PasteData pasteData) in /home/rustserver/serverfiles/carbon/plugins/CopyPaste.cs:line 1335 at void Oxide.Plugins.CopyPaste.PasteLoop(PasteData pasteData)+() => { } in /home/rustserver/serverfiles/carbon/plugins/CopyPaste.cs:line 1339 at void Carbon.Managers.CarbonProcessor.Update() in /__w/Carbon/Carbon/Carbon.Core/Carbon/src/Processors/CarbonProcessor.cs:line 63 -
@nivex I forgot after migration of my server. Thanks a lot!!
-
(19:48:04) | Failed to execute OnFrame callback (libgdiplus.so.0 assembly:<unknown assembly> type:<unknown type> member:(null)) at static System.Drawing.GDIPlus() sometimes error occurs... whats problem??
-
Can you recommend any alternative plugins? @Flammable -
Failed to call internal hook 'OnServerInitialized' on plugin 'PortableLocker v1.4.5' [352240293] (Invalid field id: 0, something went wrong in the stream) at Entity ProtoBuf.Entity.Deserialize(BufferStream stream, Entity instance, bool isDelta) x 2 at void Oxide.Plugins.PortableLocker.LoadContainer() in /home/rustserver/serverfiles/carbon/plugins/PortableLocker.cs:line 546 at void Oxide.Plugins.PortableLocker.OnServerInitialized() in /home/rustserver/serverfiles/carbon/plugins/PortableLocker.cs:line 196 at object Oxide.Plugins.PortableLocker.InternalCallHook(uint hook, object[] args) in PortableLocker.cs/Internal:line 100 this error occurred when plugin reloaded. are you sure you test this plugin??
-
I've lost items several times because of this plugin. It seems like the developer doesn't actually use the plugin they've created. The error keeps occurring, and even though the buffer file is corrupted, they claim it has been done
