Offline Raid Protection 1.6.1

On 1/11/2025 at 6:31 PM, NavyChief said:

Quick N00b question...

How does this mod determine if the person is offline or online? I ask because one of my players asked the following and for whatever reason I did not find it in the description / config:

"Protection works whether or not there is a sleeper? One way to keep peeps from finding your base when you're off line is to kill yourself. Then they can't detect the sleeper with 'view players'. Just wondering if not having a sleeper near the TC affects this mod at all"

I "think" he was basically asking if a person commits suicide after playing for a period if that base is now vulnerable to attack or protected??

 

A base doesn't need sleepers to be protected.

I will test the behaviour after committing suicide and then disconnecting whether the last online time is updated or not.

9 hours ago, NavyChief said:

I just tested a raidable base and it was NOT protected by offline raid protection!!!!!

As it should be, right? I mean, that's the point of the plugin, to raid bases.

On 1/12/2025 at 9:34 PM, NavyChief said:

SUGGESTION:  I know this has probably been requested before but I think that offline raiding should work where if the person logs off within XX minutes of the raid starting then the base should either not get protection or get less protection because people will log off as soon as the raid starts... I know there is a timer for this like 10 min but I think a better way is that if a person logs off before the raid starts maybe that 10 minute timeout is valid BUT if they log off AFTER the raid starts (first strike to building) then there should be another timer for that like 30 min or so.

I need some time to implement such a solution, as performance is a top priority. You have to be absolutely sure that a base will be raided. I have to do a lot of testing and see what is possible.

posted wrong ignore

I have a GREAT suggestion; in your mod have it check to see if you have zone manager installed and then put a zone over every base that all it does is announce as you walk up to it that it is protected and to what percentage; of course using zonemanager at all OR what is displayed in these messages should be configurable.

Suggestion for the following:

/orp or /ao <steam id or full name> — Check a player's offline protection status. You can type the command without a name when looking at a player's structure.

Show the raid protect level(s) also.

Hi all,

is there an option like "MinutesSinceLastAttackToProtect": 10, which would delay the raid protection start by 10 minutes if a raid is ongoing?

Greetings

Hey and Hello,

Is there maybe the possibility to add a feature, where a raider receives a penalty and loose his own raid protection when he raids X times in a configured time frame?

So like raiding one time another base per day is fine, raiding the complete server will end up in loosing his raid protection and make damage to others maybe more expensive ...?

Greetings

It's broken after the recent Rust update...

@realedwinThe plugin is broken after the last update, please look into this. It's important.

31 minutes ago, Flammable said:

@realedwinThe plugin is broken after the last update, please look into this. It's important.

What issues are you still having. Mine started working again. Seems everything is working properly.

For me it's giving shit ton of errors, I'm using Carbon.

Is there a way to define a no raid day instead of time?

Can a feature be added to enable/disable the plugin based on server pop?

@realedwin

Hello. I have a dumb question. I've read over the documentation, but I don't see anywhere *how* the bases are protected. Does the raider just not do damage? Does the raider take damage themselves? I missed that somewhere, I guess. I am looking mainly for a plugin that will make notifications when someone is being offline raided; we have a small, fairly mature pop that is on the 'honor system.' We haven't had any trouble, but we've gotten a lot of new players and I want to protect my folks. Thanks for any help you can provide.

hi there, i have a small question...

set the time for 3 days, yet bases show protected time as the contents of the tc, not since last log out,

im guessing i have something wrong here...

many thanks

Does this plugin work with ClansReborn?

Error while compiling OfflineRaidProtection: Argument 1: cannot convert from 'System.Collections.Generic.HashSet' to 'in System.Collections.Generic.List' | Line: 3753, Pos: 50

Error today while attempting to load

same

Error while compiling OfflineRaidProtection: Argument 1: cannot convert from 'System.Collections.Generic.HashSet<ulong>' to 'in System.Collections.Generic.List<ProtoBuf.PlayerNameID>' | Line: 3753, Pos: 50

yepp, the same here with actual version 1.1.17

Error while compiling OfflineRaidProtection: Argument 1: cannot convert from 'System.Collections.Generic.HashSet<ulong>' to 'in System.Collections.Generic.List<ProtoBuf.PlayerNameID>' | Line: 3753, Pos: 50

@realedwinstill doesn't compile

Error while compiling OfflineRaidProtection: Argument 1: cannot convert from 'System.Collections.Generic.HashSet<ulong>' to 'in System.Collections.Generic.List<ProtoBuf.PlayerNameID>' | Line: 3753, Pos: 50

26 minutes ago, Bear Grills said:

@realedwinstill doesn't compile

Error while compiling OfflineRaidProtection: Argument 1: cannot convert from 'System.Collections.Generic.HashSet<ulong>' to 'in System.Collections.Generic.List<ProtoBuf.PlayerNameID>' | Line: 3753, Pos: 50

same, still not working at this time

This plugin contains separate Carbon and Oxide flavors inside, and I think only the Carbon one was fixed.

Here's an untested attempt to port the Carbon fixes to Oxide: https://gist.github.com/HunterZ/c8c848d159fadad6e020bf139b6bac08

An official update from Edwin is now available, please use that instead!

On 11/9/2025 at 1:58 AM, HunterZ said:

This plugin contains separate Carbon and Oxide flavors inside, and I think only the Carbon one was fixed.

Here's an untested attempt to port the Carbon fixes to Oxide: https://gist.github.com/HunterZ/c8c848d159fadad6e020bf139b6bac08

Is it working? 

2 hours ago, CsaszyKJ said:

Is it working? 

In my case, NOT oxide-based