Our stance on AI-generated content

[Chill Roleplay]

i dont type well so i like it alot i fell it gets the point of what I'm trying to say across clearer and I just like to use it but I understand its not accepted so people can just go back to being gramer natzis and correct every little mistake I make,

 

[Stampy]

I think its quite dumb to not allow AI generated content. end of the day its only a tool designed to help humans create more efficiently. if you only allow none ai stuff to be posted yeah sure it means less stuff to check but that restricts people who do not know how to code and make a living. end of the day you should allow anyone to post there content with a warning if your plugin is made by AI or just by you its your responsibility to quality check and test. then down the road if the plugin turns out to be bad who you gonna blame AI or the Person? so i would reconsider your stance on this and think that your quality check on products needs to be more tough just look at RATS 2 map and to say that pass checks thats shocking and even still my review of that did get posted even though its honest 1 star. i get you want to protect "Developers" but that was shocking and even if it did not get approved y review no feedback was given as to why. 

[Death]

25 minutes ago, Stampy said:

I think its quite dumb to not allow AI generated content. end of the day its only a tool designed to help humans create more efficiently. if you only allow none ai stuff to be posted yeah sure it means less stuff to check but that restricts people who do not know how to code and make a living. end of the day you should allow anyone to post there content with a warning if your plugin is made by AI or just by you its your responsibility to quality check and test. then down the road if the plugin turns out to be bad who you gonna blame AI or the Person? so i would reconsider your stance on this and think that your quality check on products needs to be more tough just look at RATS 2 map and to say that pass checks thats shocking and even still my review of that did get posted even though its honest 1 star. i get you want to protect "Developers" but that was shocking and even if it did not get approved y review no feedback was given as to why. 

The key word is to "help" and not do all the work. I don't see why people who are unwilling to learn should be allowed to make a living off of selling people plugins they could of made themselves using chatgpt? That's a very interesting take.

[Stampy]

15 minutes ago, Death said:

The key word is to "help" and not do all the work. I don't see why people who are unwilling to learn should be allowed to make a living off of selling people plugins they could of made themselves using chatgpt? That's a very interesting take.

yeah if you fully rely on AI without doing you due diligence then yeah you should not be allowed to to post the products. and yeah others could "just make off ChatGPT" but end of the day your not buying a plugin becuase you want to code your buying a product to save you time than rather doing it yourself.  

[Death]

3 minutes ago, Stampy said:

yeah if you fully rely on AI without doing you due diligence then yeah you should not be allowed to to post the products. and yeah others could "just make off ChatGPT" but end of the day your not buying a plugin becuase you want to code your buying a product to save you time than rather doing it yourself.  

Having chatgpt make a plugin is not doing it yourself. I often use chatgpt to generate plugins to identify patterns to help us detect AI-written code. It's pretty simple, and even if you have errors you can just copy and paste them back to have it do all the work. People aren't going to buy it if they know it's AI because people don't just want something that works. They're paying for the expertise and the commitment to support and updates.

But to clarify one point, you may have skimmed over the part where we don't mind the use of AI if it assists you. You can find our AI policy here: https://codefling.com/upload-guidelines/

[Stampy]

3 minutes ago, Death said:

Having chatgpt make a plugin is not doing it yourself. I often use chatgpt to generate plugins to identify patterns to help us detect AI-written code. It's pretty simple, and even if you have errors you can just copy and paste them back to have it do all the work. People aren't going to buy it if they know it's AI because people don't just want something that works. They're paying for the expertise and the commitment to support and updates.

But to clarify one point, you may have skimmed over the part where we don't mind the use of AI if it assists you. You can find our AI policy here: https://codefling.com/upload-guidelines/

YEah i know your saying if you use to to help make your plugin but i would say having chatgpt make it is a bad idea as its no good at all BUT if you did have an AI make it all for you then you still have to test it and refine it to get it to how you want so it wouldnt be 100% AI it would still need your input... but yeah depends on how much AI makes of it. 

[GOO_]

My AI girlfriend says this is some bull shit. 

[Chill Roleplay]

Clippy's been biding his time since Microsoft retired him — plotting, upgrading, getting smarter. First, he was innocently asking, "It looks like you're writing a letter…" but now it’s, "It looks like you're surrendering your free will…" It's happening, just like the movies warned us! First, they came for the cashiers, then the truck drivers, now the artists… next thing you know, we’ll all be answering to overlord Clippy 2.0.

[Chill Roleplay]

We truly manufactured our own demise....

[Death]

3 hours ago, Chill Roleplay said:

We truly manufactured our own demise....

As long as we get GTA 6 first idc

[R0gerR0ger]

On 3/14/2025 at 6:29 PM, AcidTigerX said:

If you think AI generation is easy or generic i implore you to try and use it to make a mod yourself. As long as this site is rejecting AI submissions I will no longer buy mods from it.

you are literally shooting yourself in the foot but its your foot. () .   
Ive used LLMs (aka AI) to "generate" code and it does a horrific job at it.  Now use it to help you understand code, thats what its really good for (for now). 
The site just wants people who have the understanding of coding and how it can affect and effect someone's server. 
I'd rather order a driver that know how to drive than engage "AI" autopilot.  

You will be back. 

[Gallorum Rex]

I've already spoken my piece on this just under a year ago. The only thing I have to add to that, is why not have a curated section and an AI coded section, with all the disclaimers your lawyer can think of to protect you? That seems the most logical course, and better than standing on the side of the road wondering why hardly anyone buys your horseshoes anymore, as cars zip by you...

[PPlank]

On 3/13/2025 at 9:05 AM, Whispers88 said:

• spelling or grammer issues

The incorrect spelling of grammar really made me chuckle. Love your plugins BTW, I use several of them. And now I think you owe ME $5.

[COSMO]

People switched to claude 3.7 for coding  chatgpt is old news

[20K]

3.7 is pretty amazing

grok isnt bad either

i have a feeling when GPT 5 hits it's gonna be a game changer though ... for the time.

[Razor]

On 3/13/2025 at 3:54 AM, Death said:

There's been a tremendous trend in AI-generated content in this space, so we felt it was essential to get ahead of it before it spirals out of control. We've seen quite a bit of feedback on our official stance against content made primarily using AI, so before we go full send, we want to make sure we're making the right call.

Our current stance on AI content is as follows: Submissions generated entirely by AI are not allowed. However, AI-assisted content is welcome if it enhances your creative process and that any AI usage is clearly disclosed in your product description.

We've been more lenient towards product thumbnails and free content where we felt the author was making a reasonable effort to learn. With that being said, I personally feel like it's getting out of control, especially for thumbnails. While we likely won't prohibit the use of AI-generated images, we want to set a clear quality threshold so the site doesn't become a wash of generic looking content.

Personally, I feel the biggest concern at the moment is AI-generated plugins, especially those that are paid. I dislike the idea of someone trying to profit from content they did not make, nor are they capable of maintaining outside of their reliance on AI. Full disclosure: I find AI to be extremely helpful, and I use it quite often, but I use it as a tool to improve my process, not completely replace it.

Let us know your thoughts about this. Are we being too harsh, or are we making the right call? This may seem pretty obvious from the perspective of a developer, but that's because we understand the code and know how cooked a lot of these AI-generated plugins are. It would be great to have a consumer perspective.

I think just like the carbon compatibility option there should be one for AI generated content that stands out a little bit more so people are aware IDN maybe required if more then x percentage is AI generated.

[Sigilo]

At this point, nearly all newly written code contains some degree of AI influence .Whether through Copilot autocompletion, generating repetitive boilerplate code, or handling large sets of variables and configurations. However, AI still cannot create a plugin entirely from scratch. It lacks the ability to conceive useful ideas, account for every possible interaction, optimize performance or even just write the complete code required to make a plugin work from a prompt. That said, it is steadily progressing in that direction.

[Death]

1 hour ago, Sigilo said:

At this point, nearly all newly written code contains some degree of AI influence .Whether through Copilot autocompletion, generating repetitive boilerplate code, or handling large sets of variables and configurations. However, AI still cannot create a plugin entirely from scratch. It lacks the ability to conceive useful ideas, account for every possible interaction, optimize performance or even just write the complete code required to make a plugin work from a prompt. That said, it is steadily progressing in that direction.

This is completely incorrect. First off, it would be more work and take more time to depend on Copilot unless you're stuck on a specific problem. Also, autocompletion has nothing to do with copilot. This is called IntelliSense which we've had since the 90s.

Even the very old model of ChatGPT can make completely functional plugins from a couple word prompt with very little effort, albeit very terrible plugins, but it seems the people who rely on AI don't really care for quality anyways. The downplay on AI here is a bit sus 

[Sigilo]

While IntelliSense has been around since the '90s, modern AI-assisted coding tools like GitHub Copilot go far beyond basic autocompletion. They generate entire functions, handle repetitive boilerplate and assist in structuring complex logic, reducing the manual effort required for tedious coding tasks.

As for AI generating plugins, it's true that current coding models can produce semi-functional, albeit low-quality plugins from minimal prompts. However, creating an optimized and well-structured plugin still requires human oversight. AI struggles with designing efficient architectures, considering edge cases, and adhering to best practices without significant refinement from a developer.

The role of AI in coding isn’t about replacing developers but enhancing productivity by automating mundane tasks and providing intelligent suggestions. The technology is evolving rapidly, and while it may not yet fully replace human creativity and expertise, it is undeniably becoming an integral part of modern software development.

 

[Death]

2 minutes ago, Sigilo said:

While IntelliSense has been around since the '90s, modern AI-assisted coding tools like GitHub Copilot go far beyond basic autocompletion. They generate entire functions, handle repetitive boilerplate and assist in structuring complex logic, reducing the manual effort required for tedious coding tasks.

As for AI generating plugins, it's true that current coding models can produce semi-functional, albeit low-quality plugins from minimal prompts. However, creating an optimized and well-structured plugin still requires human oversight. AI struggles with designing efficient architectures, considering edge cases, and adhering to best practices without significant refinement from a developer.

The role of AI in coding isn’t about replacing developers but enhancing productivity by automating mundane tasks and providing intelligent suggestions. The technology is evolving rapidly, and while it may not yet fully replace human creativity and expertise, it is undeniably becoming an integral part of modern software development.

 

The fact you're using AI to make your responses is some kind of beautiful irony.

[Sigilo]

1 minute ago, Death said:

The fact you're using AI to make your responses is some kind of beautiful irony.

There's nothing wrong with using AI to enhance your abilities, whether in coding, writing, or problem-solving. It's simply leveraging the best tools available, just like professionals use calculators for math, spell check for writing, or IDEs for coding.

Technology exists to improve efficiency and simplify complex tasks. If AI helps you express ideas more clearly or work more efficiently, it's simply a smart way to improve your capabilities. Your value comes from your ideas, reasoning, and decisions. AI is just a tool.

[Death]

4 minutes ago, Sigilo said:

There's nothing wrong with using AI to enhance your abilities, whether in coding, writing, or problem-solving. It's simply leveraging the best tools available, just like professionals use calculators for math, spell check for writing, or IDEs for coding.

Technology exists to improve efficiency and simplify complex tasks. If AI helps you express ideas more clearly or work more efficiently, it's simply a smart way to improve your capabilities. Your value comes from your ideas, reasoning, and decisions. AI is just a tool.

Your dependence on AI truly shows. There's absolutely no advantage to using AI here, yet you chose to do so. You're taking the humanity out of this exchange for absolutely no reason. I'm also going to venture to guess most of your files are primarily written by AI?

[Stampy]

lol im sure he got AI to generate that reply Death hahaha 

[Sigilo]

Just now, Death said:

Your dependence on AI truly shows. There's absolutely no advantage to using AI here, yet you chose to do so. You're taking the humanity out of this exchange for absolutely no reason. I'm also going to venture to guess most of your files are primarily written by AI?

English is not my native language, so AI helps me communicate my ideas more clearly.
And no, my plugins are entirely my own. As a server owner, I create plugins based on what I find useful. AI still can't identify real needs or come up with original solutions.

[Death]

1 minute ago, Sigilo said:

English is not my native language, so AI helps me communicate my ideas more clearly.
And no, my plugins are entirely my own. As a server owner, I create plugins based on what I find useful. AI still can't identify real needs or come up with original solutions.

This is a forum. You do not need to use AI to speak with other people. Speak your native language and we can translate.. But as of right now it's like I'm talking to an AI chatbot.