Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I submit my mod 5 dash ago and still got "This file is awaiting curator review for safety and integrity.".
How much days in general take such checks?

  • Sad 2
Posted
On 5/16/2025 at 9:27 AM, PainMustDie said:

If you read earlier post from this topic some guy create plugin and wait mod for around month. So yes it very strange.

Well, what should we do, i understand you totally, but i think it will not speed up within this thread 🫠

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I am waiting as fast as I can. Maybe I need to wait faster xD. Been waiting over 2 weeks now. Can an Admin address this please? 

  • Administrator
Posted

If a plugin is going that long without being reviewed chances are it was flagged for being majority AI. Our team that reviews AI content is small and has a massive work load since a lot of submissions now of days are AI junk.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 6/2/2025 at 6:49 AM, Death said:

If a plugin is going that long without being reviewed chances are it was flagged for being majority AI. Our team that reviews AI content is small and has a massive work load since a lot of submissions now of days are AI junk.

Mine has been pending for a week, but after two days of being live, a curator downloaded it, but there's no news. And yes, I use AI a little, because I'm learning code with it. Isn't that allowed?

  • Administrator
Posted
1 minute ago, vMax said:

Mine has been pending for a week, but after two days of being live, a curator downloaded it, but there's no news. And yes, I use AI a little, because I'm learning code with it. Isn't that allowed?

Well in my experience, when someone says "used AI a little bit" that usually means the entire thing is AI. Our team will determine this during their review. But no, we do not allow submissions that are mostly AI generated as per our upload guidelines. https://codefling.com/upload-guidelines/#originality

Posted

Using AI is like cheating in Rust..... if you are going to code, learn to code. Don't take the easy way out that ruins your credibility and reputation.

Posted
9 hours ago, Death said:

Well in my experience, when someone says "used AI a little bit" that usually means the entire thing is AI. Our team will determine this during their review. But no, we do not allow submissions that are mostly AI generated as per our upload guidelines. https://codefling.com/upload-guidelines/#originality

Alright, I wasn’t aware that it was against the rules, that’s my bad. I sometimes use AI to help structure things or understand how to approach certain parts, but I try to build and learn the rest myself. It's more of a learning tool for me than anything else.

I understand that opinions on AI can vary, especially from devs who learned and worked hard before these tools existed. It’s true that seeing AI do something in minutes that took you days to master can be frustrating. But I really believe it’s just a tool like many others we've adopted over time and it won’t ever replace real developers.

I fully respect your rules and the effort behind maintaining quality on your platform. I’ll make sure anything I submit aligns with your originality policy.

Hopefully, over time, more developers will see AI for what it really is a tool to support creativity and productivity, not a replacement for real skill or experience.


 

9 hours ago, Cuda said:

Using AI is like cheating in Rust..... if you are going to code, learn to code. Don't take the easy way out that ruins your credibility and reputation.

If AI is cheating, I guess you’re coding everything in binary by hand, right?

Posted

Using AI is not going to teach you the rudimentary skills of coding. My previous statement was not directed at you; it was geared to encourage anyone to learn the coding instead of relying on a new technology. The new tech is great, but if you don't learn the basics, how can you say YOU are a coder?

Defensive extremism is not the route to take. I am still learning to code myself and no I do not code by writing it in binary.... ridiculous statement received as passive aggressive. Maybe that wasn't your intent. Good luck in the world of coding though, luckily now there's plenty of info bouncing around to assist you on your journey.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
1.8m

Downloads

Total number of downloads.

8.4k

Customers

Total customers served.

127.3k

Files Sold

Total number of files sold.

2.6m

Payments Processed

Total payments processed.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.