Forums

If you plan on having a debate about the usage of the AI and the threshold of what you consider being acceptable, let's start with you not using AI for your responses in this thread.

The majority of the code is AI, much like your responses here. AI is indeed a useful tool, but you're not using it to assist you in the process, you're using it to completely replace it. I'm almost certain you have no idea what the code does outside of what you asked AI to make you. More than happy to jump in a voice chat over Discord if you disagree.

I’d like to respond to your reply. In today's development environment, it's practically unheard of for developers to build everything completely by hand without any assistance from tools — including AI. Utilizing AI does not invalidate the originality or quality of a submission. In fact, leveraging available tools is an industry standard and part of working efficiently and professionally. While I did use AI as a support tool for parts of my code, the overall architecture, logic, integration, and refinement were all done by me. The plugin reflects my intent, decisions, and manual effort — not a copy-paste output. I'm genuinely unsure what criteria you're using to conclude that it was "entirely AI-generated," but if this is based on personal interpretation rather than objective analysis, I believe that's a serious concern. Dismissing a submission simply due to suspected AI involvement, regardless of its actual merit, raises important questions about fairness and modern development practices.

What? We get hundreds of submissions a week and have paid curators reviewing daily. While 4 weeks is a bit exaggerated it's not uncommon for it to take a couple of weeks due to the sheer volume. We take on as many curators as we can. Not sure how this is negligence? Based on your responses I had a hunch you may have used AI and I was not surprised to see your entire file is AI-generated. Ironically, it's submissions like yours that cause these long review times. I will keep the file in queue to be properly reviewed but I can tell right away it likely won't be accepted due to it being written by AI.

Thank you for reply but This isn't just an excuse — it's a clear failure of responsibility. Regardless of the internal process, taking nearly a month to review a plugin is utterly unacceptable in this day and age. It signals negligence in maintaining the platform and a lack of regard for developer support.